MODEL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES BYLAW

Presented by VAPDA
MAY 2001

 

Pages

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
 

Glossery of Terms

Main Page

Downloadable Copy

1.11 Access Roads and Above Ground Facilities
Where the construction of new wireless telecommunications towers and facilities requires construction of or improvement to access roads, to the extent practicable, roads shall follow the contour of the land, and be constructed or improved within forest or forest fringe areas, and not in open fields. Utility or service lines shall be designed and located so as to minimize or prevent disruption to the scenic character or beauty of the area. The Town may require closure of access roads to vehicles following facility construction where it is determined that site conditions warrant the same and where maintenance personnel can reasonably access the facility site on foot.

1.12 Tower and Antenna Design Requirements
Proposed facilities shall not unreasonably interfere with the view from any public park, natural scenic vista, historic building or district, or major view corridor. Height and mass of facilities shall not exceed that which is essential for the intended use and public safety.

A. Towers, antennas and any necessary support structures shall be designed to blend into the surrounding environment through the use of color camouflaging and architectural treatment, except in cases in which the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), state or federal authorities have dictated color. Use of stealth design, including those which imitate natural features, may be required in visually sensitive locations.
B. In order to protect public safety and to preserve the scenic character and appearance of the area, the height limit for towers, antennas and tower-related fixtures shall be not more than 20 feet above the average height of the tree line measured within 100 feet of the highest vertical element of the telecommunications facility. Notwithstanding the above, additional height may be approved upon a finding by the [Planning Commission/Zoning Board of Adjustment/Development Review Board] that the additional height is necessary in order to provide adequate coverage in the Town of ___________ or to accomplish collocation of facilities and that the additional height will not cause an undue visual impact on the scenic character or appearance of the area.
C. Towers, antennas and any necessary support structures shall be designed to avoid having an undue adverse impact aesthetic impact on prominent ridgelines and hilltops. In determining whether a tower's aesthetic impact would be undue and adverse, the Board will consider:
i. the period of time during which the proposed tower would be viewed by the traveling public on a public highway;
ii. the frequency of the view experienced by the traveling public;
iii. the degree to which the tower would be screened by existing vegetation, the topography of the land, and existing structures;
iv. background features in the line of sight to the proposed tower that obscure the facility or make it more conspicuous;
v. the distance of the proposed tower from the view point and the proportion of the facility that is visible above the skyline;
vi. the sensitivity or unique value of a particular view affected by the proposed tower;
vii. significant disruption of a viewshed that provides context to a historic or scenic resource.

The Board shall have the authority to impose conditions consistent with the purpose of this section in approving a proposed facility. Furthermore, the Board may designate an alternative location for the tower to be evaluated by the applicant if it is determined that the proposed location would result in undue adverse aesthetic impacts. In consideration of this, the applicant may revise its application to include such a site, assuming it is available to the applicant and reasonably technically feasible to meet the applicant's communication objectives.
D. All buildings and structures accessory to a tower (except for electric power poles where specifically exempted by the Board) shall meet the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zoning district or setback requirements specified in this bylaw. If the minimum setbacks of the underlying zoning district are less than the height of the tower, including antennas or other vertical appurtenances, the minimum distance from the tower to any property line shall be no less than the height of the tower, including antennas and other vertical appurtenances.
E. Ground mounted equipment or antennas as well as buildings and structures accessory to a tower shall be screened from view by suitable vegetation, except where a design of non-vegetative screening better complements the architectural character of the surrounding neighborhood. A planted or vegetative screen shall be a minimum of ten feet in depth with a minimum height of six feet and shall have the potential to grow to a height of at least 15 feet at maturity. Existing on-site vegetation outside the immediate site for the wireless facility shall be preserved or improved. Disturbance to existing topography shall be minimized unless the disturbance is demonstrated to result in less visual impact on the facility from surrounding properties and other vantage points.

1.13 Amendments to Existing Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit
An alteration or addition to a previously approved wireless telecommunications facility shall require a permit amendment when any of the following are proposed:

A. Change in the number of buildings or facilities permitted on the site;
B. Addition or change of any equipment resulting in greater visibility or structural windloading, or additional height of the tower, including profile of additional antennas, not specified in the original application.

Pages

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
 

Glossery of Terms

Main Page

Downloadable Copy